Draft email protocol · Phase 0 · Experimental

eXplicit Consent-Identified Mail (XCIM)

XCIM is a draft email protocol for associating independently issued, identity-backed permission evidence with an application, a recipient, defined communication purposes, and currently authorized sending infrastructure.

XCIM is designed to complement SPF, DKIM, DMARC, ARC and existing unsubscribe mechanisms. It does not replace them, guarantee inbox placement, or establish universal legal compliance.

STATUSDraft v0.1
MATURITYPhase 0 · Experimental
PRODUCTIONNot recommended
INITIATED BYWe Are 14 Inc.
REFERENCEEmabled

Introduction

Email authentication mechanisms can identify sending infrastructure and domain responsibility, but they do not independently establish that a particular recipient authorized a particular application to send a defined category of communication.

XCIM introduces a portable consent receipt issued by an independent issuer after identity-provider-backed authentication and an explicit decision presented on issuer-controlled infrastructure.

The signed receipt records the historical decision. Verification combines that receipt with current revocation state, application identity, sender-domain bindings, issuer policy, and receiver-local trust.

Read the protocol introduction →

Current documents

XCIM document publication status
DocumentTypeStatusLink
XCIM Protocol OverviewInformativeAvailableView
XCIM Trust and Threat ModelInformativeDraftingNot yet linked
XCIM Core Protocol v0.1NormativePublication pendingStatus
Receipt FormatNormativeDraftingNot yet linked
Consent ManifestNormativeDraftingNot yet linked
Message BindingNormativeDraftingNot yet linked
Registry and DiscoveryNormativeDraftingNot yet linked
Transparency and Current StateNormativeDraftingNot yet linked
Conformance VectorsTest materialNot publishedNot yet linked

Open the document index →

Relationship to the email stack

Mechanisms and their primary assertions
MechanismPrimary assertion
SPFWhich hosts are authorized to use a domain in the SMTP path.
DKIMWhich domain signed selected message content and headers.
DMARCAlignment and handling policy for authenticated domain identities.
ARCPreservation of authentication results across intermediaries.
List-UnsubscribeA standardized mechanism for requesting subscription removal.
Double opt-inA confirmation event normally retained within sender or ESP-controlled infrastructure.
XCIMIndependently issued, identity-backed, purpose-specific permission evidence with separately resolved current state.

XCIM adds a positive permission signal. Receivers continue to evaluate malware, phishing, reputation, content, abuse patterns, and local policy.

Implementation and deployment

XCIM is designed for multiple independent issuers, local receiver trust, portable receipts, and verification that does not require a per-message call to a commercial issuer.

Reference architecture

  • Issuer-hosted consent presentation
  • Vendor-owned OAuth/OIDC application identity
  • Signed consent receipts
  • Application and sender-domain epochs

Verification distribution

  • Append-only issuance and revocation events
  • Public root anchoring profile
  • Resolver-based local verification
  • Receiver-local issuer trust policy

Emabled is the managed reference issuer and commercial implementation operated by We Are 14 Inc. It is not part of the normative protocol and is not the only issuer the protocol is designed to support.

Development and governance

XCIM was initiated by We Are 14 Inc. and remains under founder-led Phase 0 governance while the v0.1 byte-level formats, test vectors, security model, and reference implementation are completed.

XCIM is not currently an IETF standard, is not operated by an independent foundation, and does not yet claim a formal multi-stakeholder working group.

Related work

XCIM complements established email authentication and unsubscribe mechanisms, depends on OpenID Connect for the v1 identity profile, borrows transparency patterns from Certificate Transparency, and uses authenticated data structures for independently checkable history and state.

Review related protocols and standards →